Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Human S100A5 binds Ca2+ and Cu2+ independently

BMC BiophysicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201710:8

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13628-017-0040-y

Received: 19 September 2017

Accepted: 8 November 2017

Published: 22 November 2017

Abstract

Background

S100A5 is a calcium binding protein found in a small subset of amniote tissues. Little is known about the biological roles of S100A5, but it may be involved in inflammation and olfactory signaling. Previous work indicated that S100A5 displays antagonism between binding of Ca2+ and Cu2+ ions—one of the most commonly cited features of the protein. We set out to characterize the interplay between Ca2+ and Cu2+ binding by S100A5 using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD), and analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC).

Results

We found that human S100A5 is capable of binding both Cu2+ and Ca2+ ions simultaneously. The wildtype protein was extremely aggregation-prone in the presence of Cu2+ and Ca2+. A Cys-free version of S100A5, however, was not prone to precipitation or oligomerization. Mutation of the cysteines does not disrupt the binding of either Ca2+ or Cu2+ to S100A5. In the Cys-free background, we measured Ca2+ and Cu2+ binding in the presence and absence of the other metal using ITC. Saturating concentrations of Ca2+ or Cu2+ do not disrupt the binding of one another. Ca2+ and Cu2+ binding induce structural changes in S100A5, which are measurable using CD spectroscopy. We show via sedimentation velocity AUC that the wildtype protein is prone to the formation of soluble oligomers, which are not present in Cys-free samples.

Conclusions

S100A5 can bind Ca2+ and Cu2+ ions simultaneously and independently. This observation is in direct contrast to previously-reported antagonism between binding of Cu2+ and Ca2+ ions. The previous result is likely due to metal-dependent aggregation. Little is known about the biology of S100A5, so an accurate understanding of the biochemistry is necessary to make informed biological hypotheses. Our observations suggest the possibility of independent biological functions for Cu2+ and Ca2+ binding by S100A5.

Keywords

S100A5S100 proteinsITCAUCCalcium binding proteinsCopper bindingCircular dichroism

Background

S100A5 is a member of the calcium-binding S100 protein family. The protein is primarily homodimeric and is capable of binding one Ca2+ ion each at it’s EF-hand and pseudo-EF-hand sites [1, 2]. S100A5 undergoes a notable conformational change upon calcium-binding, resulting in the rotation and extension of a helix [1]. This Ca2+-driven exposure of a hydrophobic surface is the primary mode of signal transduction in the S100 proteins [3]. Through interactions with metals and protein targets, S100s play a variety of biological roles including control of cell proliferation, inflammatory signalling, and antimicrobial activity [47].

S100A5 is expressed primarily in the olfactory bulb and olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs). Its expression is dramatically upregulated by odor stimulation [810]. It has been proposed that S100A5 is actively involved in olfactory signalling due to its expression profile [9]. Expression of the protein has also been observed in a small number of other tissues [10]. It is used as a bio-marker for several types of brain cancers and inflammatory disorders and appears to be involved in inflammation via activation of RAGE [2, 11, 12]. Genetic work on S100A5 has been minimal, which has limited our understanding of its biological roles.

The first biochemical study of human S100A5 identified it as a novel Ca2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ binding protein [9]. The authors used flow-dialysis to measure binding of the metal ions to the protein and concluded that S100A5 is capable of binding four Ca2+ ions, four Cu2+ ions, and two Zn2+ ions per homodimer. One of the most striking observations of that study was the strong antagonism between the binding of Cu2+ and Ca2+ ions to the protein. This feature is one of the most highly cited aspects of S100A5. Because little is known about the protein, this fact is present in descriptions found across databases such as Uniprot, NCBI, Wikigenes, and Genecards [1315]. While most S100s are capable of binding transition metal ions, antagonism with binding of Ca2+ is not known outside the S100A5 lineage. Thus, this unique feature of S100A5 provoked speculation about its possible biological implications [9, 16]. It was suggested that S100A5 might act as a Cu2+ and Ca2+ regulated signal during olfaction or as a Cu2+ sink to accommodate high Cu2+ concentrations in the olfactory bulb [9].

We sought to characterize this presumably important feature of S100A5 in more detail. Previously, we characterized the binding of Cu2+ and Zn2+ to a large number of S100 proteins including S100A5 [17]. Via ITC competition experiments, we established that these two metals bind at different sites on the protein and do not compete for binding [17]. We found that mutation of Cys43 and Cys79 lead to a loss of Zn2+ binding. In contrast neither of these residues was necessary for binding of Cu2+. Due to the original report of Ca2+ /Cu2+ antagonism we suspected that Ca2+ and Cu2+ may compete for the same sites on S100A5.

Here we report our study of the interplay between Ca2+ and Cu2+ binding by S100A5. Using a Cysteine-free variant (C43S/C79S) of the protein, we show that binding of Ca2+ and Cu2+ are not in fact antagonistic. The protein is capable of binding the two metals–which induce notable structural changes–simultaneously and independently. Furthermore, we establish that the Cysteine-containing (WT) protein is prone to the formation of high-ordered oligomers in solution, while the Cysteine-free variant is almost entirely dimeric. We suggest that this propensity for formation of large oligomeric species and precipitation under our experimental conditions may underlie the apparent antagonism observed in the original S100A5 report. Our results may suggest new biological roles for Cu2+ binding by this protein.

Results

Ca2+ and Cu2+ binding to S100A5 are not antagonistic

Antagonism between Cu2+ and Ca2+ binding was previously identified as a distinct feature of S100A5 relative to other S100 proteins [9, 16, 18]. We hypothesized that Cu2+ and Ca2+ may bind using the same ligands, thus explaining the antagonism as direct competition. It was suggested in the original paper that Cu2+ and Ca2+ might share some ligands [9]. We performed ITC competition experiments to test whether Cu2+ and Ca2+ directly compete. We titrated Cu2+ onto S100A5 in the presence of saturating Ca2+. However, these experiments were difficult to interpret due to extensive precipitation in the samples containing both ions. ITC traces were very noisy and apparent stoichiometries were systematically low (≈0.2), suggesting that a large portion of the protein sample was not competent to bind Cu2+ (Fig. 1). Together these observations suggested that a metal-driven aggregation process could be occurring in our samples.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Measurements of Cu2+ binding to wildtype S100A5 in the presence of Ca2+ are difficult to interpret. Representative ITC trace showing Cu2+ titrated onto Ca2+-bound wildtype S100A5. Inset shows raw data trace. Data were characteristically noisy and the apparent fraction competent was systematically low

We found previously that neither of the two native Cys residues in S100A5 were required for Cu2+ binding [17]. We also noticed that–unlike the wildtype protein–the Cys-free mutant did not precipitate in the presence of saturating Ca2+ and Cu2+. We thus sought to use ITC to characterize the interaction between binding of the two metal ions using the Cys-Ser double mutant. Because some of the metal-binding curves were complex and difficult to fit, we used a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler–as implemented in pytc–to estimate thermodynamic parameters for all binding models [19]. We also included a floating “fraction competent” parameter to capture uncertainty in the relative protein and metal concentrations (following SEDPHAT [20]). This was necessary because a number of factors make it difficult to obtain accurate estimates of concentrations for components of this system. S100A5 has no tryptophan residues and, therefore, a low extinction coefficient that makes absorbance-based concentration estimates unreliable. Further, water absorption by dry metal salts, as well as interactions between metal ions and buffer, can also make estimates of metal concentration difficult. Because of these of uncertainties, ITC has been noted to provide poor estimates of stoichiometry for protein metal binding [21].

We first used ITC to remeasure binding of Cu2+ ions to the apo form of the S100A5 double mutant. We found the Cu2+ binding data was best described with a single-site binding model. In line with our previous observations, the protein bound Cu2+ with a K d (μ M) that had a 95% credibility region of 0.94≤1.81≤3.90 (Fig. 2 a, Table 1). We next measured the binding of Cu2+ in the presence of saturating Ca2+. Ca2+ had no detectable effect on the binding of Cu2+ to the protein, giving a K d (μ M) of 0.65≤0.96≤1.47 (Fig. 2 b; Table 1).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

S100A5 can bind Ca2+ and Cu2+ simultaneously without antagonism. Plots show integrated data and global Bayesian fits from replicate isothermal titration calorimetry experiments: (a) Cu2+ binding to apo protein, (b) Cu2+ binding to Ca2+-saturated protein, (c) Ca2+ binding to apo protein, and (d) Ca2+ binding to Cu2+-saturated protein. Points are integrated titration shots. Lines are 100 curves drawn from the posterior distribution of the MCMC samples. For Cu2+ binding experiments technical replicates are shown in blue and red. Ca2+ binding experiments were performed with fixed protein concentration and four different titrant/titrate ratios: 8X (blue), 10X (purple), 15X (red), and 18X (green). For clarity Y-axes display total heat per shot, so that curves from different titrant concentrations fall on different areas of the graph. Raw data corresponding to these integrated heats are displayed in Additional file 1: Figure S1

Table 1

Fit parameters from pytc fits

Ion

Cu 2+

Ca 2+

Competitor

None

Ca 2+

None

Cu 2+

Δ H 1

− 5.7≤−3.4≤−2.8

− 4.1≤−3.6≤−3.2

− 1.8≤−1.4≤−0.7

− 1.5≤−1.2≤−0.7

Δ H 2

− 5.7≤−4.6≤−3.7

− 5.0≤−4.1≤−3.4

K d,1

0.9≤1.8≤3.9

0.7≤1.0≤1.5

0.4≤0.5≤2.7

0.03≤0.2≤2.2

K d,2

1.9≤6.3≤34.9

1.9≤10.5≤100

fx. comp.

1.40≤1.43≤1.47

1.15≤1.17≤1.19

0.61≤0.66≤0.69

0.54≤0.58≤0.61

Table contains values for key parameters determined via global fits of ITC data using the Bayesian MCMC fitter in pytc. Ninety-five percent credibility regions from the posterior distributions are reported for parameter values. Δ H values are reported in kcal·mol −1, K d values in μ M. Final parameter is fraction competent, a nuisance parameter that captures what fraction of the metal and protein in solution are competent for the measured reaction

We next performed the inverse set of experiments. We used ITC to measure the binding of Ca2+ to the protein in the apo and Cu2+ –saturated forms. For each condition, we used four different titrant/stationary ratios to better resolve the complex Ca2+ binding curve and then globally fit a binding model to all four datasets (Fig. 2 c). This binding curve had two distinct phases and could be fit with a two-site binding polynomial (Fig. 2 c). These Ca2+ binding curves presented a challenging model-fitting problem due to the complex shape of the curve. The individual enthalpies and binding constants may therefore be under-determined in our analysis. To resolve realistic parameter values from the binding polynomial model, we constrained the dilution heat and dilution intercept in the Bayesian fit to reasonable values.

We observed one high-affinity site (K d (μ M): 0.14≤0.46≤2.68) and one lower-affinity site (K d (μ M): 1.85≤6.33≤34.88). The values were roughly consistent with those reported in the literature [2]. The presence of saturating Cu2+ did not inhibit the binding of Ca2+ ions (Fig. 2 d; Table 1). The K d value of the low affinity site (K d (μ M): 0.03≤0.18≤2.16) was not distinguishable within uncertainty from that of the apo protein. The K d of the high affinity site (K d (μ M): 1.86≤10.46≤100.3) is similarly indistinguishable from that for the apo protein (Table 1). Our results clearly demonstrate that Ca2+ and Cu2+ ions do not display strong antagonism when binding to S100A5.

S100A5 is prone to oligomerization and metal-driven aggregation

We hypothesized that the metal-driven aggregation process observed in our ITC experiments with the wildtype protein contributed to the apparent antagonism that was previously reported. To further examine this aggregation process we used sedimentation velocity AUC to test for the presence of oligomers in solution. We hypothesized that the oligomerization of the wildtype protein was driven by the presence of Cysteine residues. Due to the presence of Cu2+ in some samples we were unable to use a reducing agent in either the ITC or AUC experiments.

We performed sedimentation velocity AUC experiments on both the wildtype and Cys-Ser double mutant proteins in both the apo form and the form loaded simultaneously with Cu2+ and Ca2+. We fit the Lamm equation to the sedimentation data using SedFit to calculate the c(s) distribution of the protein in each condition [22, 23]. We found that apo S100A5 formed high-ordered oligomers, ranging to at least dodecamers (Fig. 3 a). Addition of Cu2+ and Ca2+ caused a large amount of precipitation in wildtype S100A5 that we removed by extensive centrifugation prior to loading the cell. The remaining soluble protein was indistinguishable from the apo protein (Fig. 3 b). In contrast, when we performed the same experiments with the Cys-Ser double mutant we found that the protein was primarily dimeric in solution (Fig. 3 c, d), even with the addition of Cu2+ and Ca2+. However, monomers were also detectable in the double mutant samples. The monomer peak appears to be more prominent in the apo-protein sample than in the sample saturated with Cu2+ and Ca2+, suggesting that binding of metals may stabilize the dimeric form (Fig. 3 c, d). Our AUC results clearly demonstrate that oligomerization of S100A5 is driven by the native cysteine residues, which also likely cause the visible aggregation we observed in the ITC experiments. This observation strongly suggests that the previously-reported apparent antagonism between Ca2+ and Cu2+ was due to oligomerization and/or aggregation.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Wildtype S100A5 is prone to the formation of high-ordered oligomers. Sedimentation velocity AUC distribution plots showing (a) apo wildtype S100A5, (b) wildtype S100A5 saturated with Cu2+ and Ca2+, (c) apo Cys-Ser double mutant, and (d) Cys-Ser double mutant saturated with Cu2+ and Ca2+. Data are normalized to the same scale. Homodimers are the peaks near s=2. The Cys-Ser double mutant plots show evidence of some monomer (peak near s=1) in solution

Binding of Ca2+ and Cu2+ induce reversible changes in S100A5 secondary structure

One hallmark feature of the S100 proteins is the change in secondary structure observed upon binding of metal ions [17, 24, 25]. Metal-induced conformational changes expose a binding interface that can bind downstream targets and regulate their activities [2, 3]. In the original publication on S100A5 biochemical characterization, the authors found that the secondary structure of the protein is insensitive to the binding of metal ions [9]. However, we previously found that binding of Ca2+ ions to wildtype S100A5 induces a significant (≈25%) reversible increase in α-helical secondary structure, which is consistent with the changes observed in published NMR data [1, 2]. Due to instantaneous sample precipitation, we were unable to reliably measure structural changes of wildtype S100A5 in the presence of Cu2+. However, the Cys-Ser double mutant protein alleviates this issue. We collected far-UV circular dichroism spectra of the mutant protein in the apo form and bound to Ca2+, Cu2+, and Ca2+ and Cu2+ simultaneously. The Cys-Ser mutant displays a notable increase in alpha-helical signal (222 nm) upon binding of Ca2+, identical to the wildtype protein. Interestingly, addition of Cu2+ also induces an increase in α-helical signal that is approximately half of that induced by Ca2+. The spectrum of S100A5 bound simultaneously to both metals is identical to that of the Ca2+-bound form (Fig. 4). This structural change is not due to oligomerization, as the protein remains a dimer under these conditions by AUC (Fig. 3 d). All the metal induced structural changes were instantly reversible by the addition of a molar excess of EDTA. These results may help to explain the minor differences–such as larger enthalpy–in Ca2+ binding to the Cu2+ –bound form of the protein, which may be due to moderate structural differences from the apo-protein. Despite the lack of antagonism between binding affinities for Ca2+ and Cu2+ ions, there is still indication of some structural interplay between the two metals.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Ca2+ and Cu2+ induce increases in α-helical secondary structure measured by far UV circular dichroism. Curves show mean molar ellipticity vs. wavelength for each experimental condition: Apo (gray), bound to Cu2+ (orange), bound to Ca2+ (blue), and bound to both Cu2+ and Ca2+ (red)

Discussion

S100A5 is one of the lesser-known members of the S100 protein family. Its expression pattern is very narrow and its biological functions are mostly uncharacterized. However, it has been the target of multiple biochemical studies that have sought to characterize the properties of the protein itself. Binding of metals and proteins to S100A5 have been studied using various techniques [1, 2, 9, 11, 17]. X-ray crystallography and NMR have been used to solve structures of both apo and Ca2+ –bound forms of the protein [1, 26]. Despite the available biochemical data aspects of S100A5 have remained ambiguous. For example, the stoichiometry of transition metal binding and structural responses to metal binding have been variably reported [9, 17].

One of the most noted features of S100A5 is the strong antagonism between binding of Ca2+ and Cu2+ ions. This feature is reported in the gene descriptions found in many databases [1315]. In this study we set out to characterize this unique feature of S100A5, hypothesizing that it was due to competition between the two metals for shared ligands. However, we found an absence of direct binding antagonism between Ca2+ and Cu2+. Neither metal ion affects the binding constant for the other. Instead, we observed a propensity of the protein for oligomerization and metal-induced aggregation. It is possible that the reduction of binding-competent protein caused by this aggregation process was interpreted in the original flow dialysis study of S100A5 as antagonism between Ca2+ and Cu2+. We also report notable changes in the secondary structure of S100A5 upon binding of both Ca2+ and Cu2+, which is contrary the original report that S100A5 structure is insensitive to the binding of metals.

One intriguing implication of our observations is that the Cu2+ binding site of S100A5 must be quite distinct from that of other S100 proteins. Ca2+ and Cu2+ clearly do not share ligands, or there would be evidence of competition in our ITC experiments. Cysteine residues are thought to be involved in metal-binding in some other S100s [16, 27] and we previously showed that the Cys-free mutant of S100A5 displays compromised Zn2+ binding [17]. However, neither native Cys residue of S100A5 is required for Cu2+ binding. Furthermore, we showed that Zn2+ and Cu2+ do not share ligands, as they do not compete at all in ITC experiments [17]. In addition, mutation of His17–which is present in the canonical transition metal site of many S100s–also had no effect on Cu2+ binding in S100A5 [17]. The results presented here with the Cys-free mutant also clearly rule out the possibility of oligomer-dependent Cu2+ binding, such as could be achieved by the formation of a new site in a high-order oligomeric species. Thus, we still have no clues as to where Cu2+ ions bind on S100A5. Further characterization–such as via scanning mutagenesis–will be necessary to determine the identity of Cu2+ ligands.

Biological roles for the binding of transition metals have been established for some S100s and suggested for many others [16, 18, 2729]. The binding constants that we measured for Ca2+ and Cu2+ suggest the possibility of physiologically relevant interactions in some tissues. Free Ca2+ concentrations in rat olfactory neurons reach ≈2 μ M during nerve stimulation [30]. Likewise, pools of Cu2+ are released in and around olfactory neurons during signaling, reaching concentrations as high as 10 μ M in the synapse [3134]. Further, despite high Cu2+ concentrations, the olfactory bulb in rats does not have elevated expression of the typical copper chaperone metallothionein [35]. It has been suggested that S100A5 may play a role as a Cu2+ buffer or chaperone in OSNs during olfactory signaling [9]. The fact that Cu2+ is able to induce structural changes in S100A5 suggests it could play a more active role: S100A5 could actually respond to Cu2+ and propagate a resulting signal by interacting with downstream targets.

Due to lack of antagonism, Cu2+ –dependent functions could be achieved even in the presence of saturating Ca2+ levels. Furthermore, there could be synergistic functional roles for binding of Ca2+ and Cu2+. For example, if S100A5 is acting as a Cu2+ chaperone, binding of Ca2+ could facilitate binding of protein targets–via exposure of the hydrophobic binding interface–to which Cu2+ is being delivered. Furthermore, S100A5 is capable of binding Zn2+ ions–which are also at high concentration in the olfactory bulb–with similar affinity to Cu2+ [34]. Zn2+ and Cu2+ also bind noncompetitively and thus all three metals could potentially engage in synergistic activities [17].

One final possibility is that the oligomerization process we observed in this study may actually have a biological function. Wildtype S100A5 is prone to the formation of oligomers even in the apo form and is subject to extensive aggregation in solutions containing Ca2+ and Cu2+ even at relatively low protein concentrations. Roles for metal-driven oligomerization in S100s have been suggested previously [7, 3638]. It is conceivable that Ca2+ and Cu2+ drive oligomerization of S100A5 in cells to facilitate a biological function, but further experiments would be required to determine if this process occurs in the reducing environment of the cell at physiologically-relevant concentrations of S100A5, Ca2+ and Cu2+.

Future experiments are needed to elucidate the biochemical features and biological functions of S100A5 that remain unknown. It will be important to identify the Cu2+ ligands in S100A5 to fully understand the biochemical interplay between the binding of various biologically relevent metals. To understand how Ca2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ contribute to the biological activity of S100A5, experiments should be targeted at directly testing how these metals interact with the protein in vivo. The identification of more S100A5 biological targets and an increase in functional studies will be required to determine the chief roles of S100A5 in its cellular environment.

Conclusions

Antagonism between binding of Ca2+ and Cu2+ ions to S100A5 is one of the most oft-cited aspects of this protein. Several possible biological roles have been suggested. Using careful biophysical characterization, we discovered that binding of Ca2+ and Cu2+ ions is not antagonistic. A Cys-free mutant version of the protein makes measurements of metal binding using ITC possible and shows that the protein is capable of binding both metals simultaneously and independently. Rather than binding antagonism, it appears that the wildtype protein is prone to oligomerization and aggregation and that these behaviors may have contributed to the original interpretation. Furthermore, we also measured the effects of Ca2+ and Cu2+ binding on S100A5 secondary structure and found that both metals are capable of inducing increases in α-helical secondary character. These results also contrast the original report on S100A5 [9], but are consistent with previously published NMR data [1]. The ability to bind Ca2+ and Cu2+ independently as well as the structural response to Cu2+ may suggest new Cu2+ –dependent biological roles for S100A5.

Methods

Protein expression and purification

We previously generated the 6-histidine-tagged cysteine double-mutant construct in a pet28/30 vector [17]. In this study, the protein was expressed and purified using the same protocol detailed in the previous publication. Briefly, the protein was expressed in a 1.5L culture of Rosetta (DE3) pLysS cells (Millipore). Cells were lysed by sonication and treatment with DNase and lysozyme. Subsequently, the tagged protein was purified using HisTrap Ni2+ affinity columns (GE). The tag was then cleaved using TEV protease and the cleaved protein was further purified using Ca2+-dependent hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Finally, the sample was run over a second HisTrap Ni2+ affinity column to remove any uncleaved protein. The purified protein was dialyzed with 6000-8000 MWCO tubing (Fisher) against 2L 25 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 with 2g chelex resin (BioRad). The dialyzed protein was filter-sterilized (0.22 μ m), flash-frozen dropwise in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80°C. We experimentally determined the extinction coefficient (5002M −1 cm −1) of the Cys-Ser double mutant. We measured the A 280 of the protein at the same concentration in both buffer and denaturing 6M GdHCl (Sigma). We used ProtParam [39] to predict an extinction coefficient for the protein based on sequence and then calculated the corrected coefficient using the equation ε native =ε 6MGdm ·A 280,native /A 280,6MGdm . Concentration measurements were also corrected for scattering in samples [40]. Due to the low extinction coefficient of the protein, concentration is difficult to measure with high confidence, even with this careful protocol.

Isothermal titration calorimetry

Samples were prepared in 25 mM TES (Sigma), 100 mM NaCl (Thermo Scientific), buffer at pH 7.4. Protein was thawed from the frozen stock and exchanged into the experimental buffer using NAP-25 desalting columns (GE Healthcare). For competition experiments the experimental buffer also contained either 1 mM CaCl 2 (Sigma) or 0.25 mM CuCl 2 (Sigma). Titrant solutions were prepared in matching experimental buffer to ensure identical conditions to titrate. Anhydrous CaCl 2 or CuCl 2 was dissolved directly in the buffer and diluted to the appropriate concentration immediately prior to experiments. Fresh stocks were made for each set of experiments. Experiments were performed with 50-80 μ M protein at 25 °C. Two technical replicates of each Cu2+ binding experiment were performed. To resolve the complex Ca2+ binding curves, four Ca2+ binding experiments were performed using four different concentrations of titrant. Raw data were integrated using the NITPIC software package–which allows uncertainty in the baseline–and the integrated heats were exported in standard SedPhat format [41]. We then used the Bayesian MCMC iterator included in pytc to estimate model parameters against all experiments simultaneously [19]. We used the maximum likelihood estimate as a starting point and then explored the likelihood surface with 100 walkers, each taking 20,000 steps. We discarded the first 10% of steps as burn in. We restricted parameters against all experiments simultaneously. We verified convergence by performing the sampling procedure several times. A single site binding model was used for Cu2+ titration data and a two-site binding polynomial was used for Ca2+ titration data [42, 43]. For Ca2+ binding fits, we constrained the dilution heat and dilution intercept to between -3.0–0.0 kcal/mol and 0–10,000 kcal/mol/shot respectively. All other priors were uniform.

Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation

Experiments were done in 25 mM TES (Sigma), 100 mM NaCl (Thermo Scientific), 100 μ M EDTA at pH 7.4 with the appropriate metal added directly to the buffer during preparation. Metals were added to a final concentration of 250 μ M. Samples were prepared at 40 μ M in the appropriate experimental buffer by overnight dialysis (6000-8000 MWCO) against 2L at 4 °C. Before ultracentrifugation samples were centrifuged at 18,000×g at 4 °C in a temperature-controlled centrifuge for 30 min. Ultracentrifugation was done with sapphire windows at 50,000×g in sector-shaped cells (Beckman) on a Beckman ProteomeLab XL-1. Sedimentation was monitored using interference mode rather than absorbance at 280 nm due to the low extinction coefficient of S100A5. The Lamm equation was fit to the sedimentation data–using SedFit–to calculate the continuous c(s) distribution [22, 23]. Estimated sedimentation coefficients of the species present in solution were calculated from the numerical fits.

Circular dichroism spectroscopy

Far-UV circular dichroism spectra (200–250 nm) were collected on a J-815 CD spectrometer (Jasco) with a 1 mm quartz cell (Starna Cells, Inc.). We prepared 50 μ M samples in a Chelex (Bio-Rad) treated, 25 mM TES (Sigma), 100 mM NaCl (Thermo Scientific), 100 μ M EDTA, buffer at pH 7.4. Samples were subsequently diluted to 25 μ M in buffers containing: no metal (apo), 1 mM Ca2+, 1 mM Cu2+, or both 1 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Cu2+ –all prepared in the stock buffer above. Samples were centrifuged at 18,000×g at 25 °C in a temperature-controlled centrifuge (Eppendorf) before experiments. Spectra were collected at 25 °C in a Jasco peltier multi-cell sample unit. Reversibility of metal-induced structural changes was confirmed by adding a molar excess of EDTA to the metal-saturated samples and repeating spectra collection. In all cases, addition of EDTA returned the samples to the apo state. Five scans of each condition were collected. These scans were then averaged–using Jasco spectra analysis software–to minimize noise. Buffer blank spectra were generated for each condition. Applicable blanks were subtracted in the Jasco spectra analysis software. Blank-corrected data were exported as text files and raw signal was converted into mean molar ellipticity using the concentration and the number of residues (N res =95) in our S100A5 construct using the equation: MME=CD signal /c(M)·10·L(cmN res .

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank members of the Harms lab for useful conversations regarding interpretation of the results. We would also like to thank Stephen Weitzel in the von Hippel group for his assistance with the AUC experiments.

Funding

This work was funded by NIH R01GM117140 (MJH) and NIH training grant 7T32GM007759 (LCW). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the claims in this paper are available on the Harms lab GitHub page at https://github.com/harmslab/wheeler-harms-S100A5-Ca-Cu-data

Authors’ contributions

LCW and MJH conceived the study and designed the experiments. LCW performed all experiments and data analysis. MJH secured funding for the work. LCW wrote the manuscript and generated the figures. Both authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA
(2)
Insitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA

References

  1. Bertini I, Gupta SD, Hu X, Karavelas T, Luchinat C, Parigi G, et al. Solution structure and dynamics of S100A5 in the apo and Ca2+-bound states. JBIC J Biol Inorg Chem. 2009; 14(7):1097–107. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00775-009-0553-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim I, Lee KO, Yun YJ, Jeong JY, Kim EH, Cheong H, et al. Biophysical characterization of Ca2+-binding of S100A5 and Ca2+-induced interaction with RAGE. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017; 483(1):332–8. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X16322033.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Santamaria-Kisiel L, Rintala-Dempsey AC, Shaw GS. Calcium-dependent and -independent interactions of the S100 protein family. Biochem J. 2006; 396(2):201–14. Available from: http://www.biochemj.org/content/396/2/201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Leclerc E, Fritz G, Vetter SW, Heizmann CW. Binding of S100 proteins to RAGE: An update. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol Cell Res. 2009; 1793(6):993–1007. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167488908004151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Heizmann CW, Cox JA. New perspectives on S100 proteins: a multi-functional Ca 2+ -, Zn 2+ - and Cu 2+ -binding protein family. Biometals; 11(4):383–97. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009212521172.
  6. Zhu W, Xue Y, Liang C, Zhang R, Zhang Z, Li H, et al. S100A16 promotes cell proliferation and metastasis via AKT and ERK cell signaling pathways in human prostate cancer. Tumor Biol. 2016; 37(9):12241–50. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13277-016-5096-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Donato R, Cannon BR, Sorci G, Riuzzi F, Hsu K, Weber DJ, et al. Functions of S100 Proteins. Curr Mol Med. 2013; 13(1):24–57. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707951/.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischl AM, Heron PM, Stromberg AJ, McClintock TS. Activity-Dependent Genes in Mouse Olfactory Sensory Neurons. Chem Senses. 2014; 39(5):439–49. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/chemse/article/39/5/439/2908167/Activity-Dependent-Genes-in-Mouse-Olfactory.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Schäfer BW, Fritschy JM, Murmann P, Troxler H, Durussel I, Heizmann CW, et al. Brain S100A5 Is a Novel Calcium-, Zinc-, and Copper Ion-binding Protein of the EF-hand Superfamily. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275(39):30623–30. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/275/39/30623.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Teratani T, Watanabe T, Yamahara K, Kumagai H, Ishikawa A, Arai K, et al. Restricted Expression of Calcium-Binding Protein S100A5 in Human Kidney. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 291(3):623–7. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X02964946.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho CC, Chou RH, Yu C. Pentamidine blocks the interaction between mutant S100A5 and RAGE V domain and inhibits the RAGE signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016; 477(2):188–94. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X16309597.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hancq S, Salmon I, Brotchi J, De Witte O, Gabius HJ, Heizmann CW, et al. S100A5: a marker of recurrence in WHO grade I meningiomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2004; 30(2):178–87. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.0305-1846.2003.00525.x/abstract.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. WikiGenes-Collaborative Publishing. Available from http://www.wikigenes.org/. Accessed 31 Aug 2017.
  14. S, 100A5 Gene-GeneCards | S10A5 Protein | S10A5 Antibody. Available from: http://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=S100A5. Accessed 31 Aug 2017.
  15. S, 100A5 - Protein S100-A5 - Homo sapiens (Human) - S100A5 gene & protein. Available from: http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P33763. Accessed 31 Aug 2017.
  16. Moroz OV, Wilson KS, Bronstein IB. The role of zinc in the S100 proteins: insights from the X-ray structures. Amino Acids. 2010; 41(4):761–72. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00726-010-0540-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wheeler LC, Donor MT, Prell JS, Harms MJ. Multiple Evolutionary Origins of Ubiquitous Cu2+ and Zn2+ Binding in the S100 Protein Family. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(10):164740. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0164740.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilston BA, Skaar EP, Chazin WJ. Binding of transition metals to S100 proteins. Sci China Life Sci. 2016;1–10 Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11427-016-5088-4.
  19. pytc: python program for analyzing isothermal titration calorimetry data. Harms Lab @ University of Oregon; 2017. Original-date: 2016-06-23T00:52:45Z. Available from: https://github.com/harmslab/pytc. Accessed 2017.
  20. Zhao H, Piszczek G, Schuck P. SEDPHAT – A platform for global ITC analysis and global multi-method analysis of molecular interactions. Methods. 2015; 76(Supplement C):137–48. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202314003752.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang Y, Akilesh S, Wilcox DE. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Measurements of Ni(II) and Cu(II) Binding to His, GlyGlyHis, HisGlyHis, and Bovine Serum Albumin: A Critical Evaluation. Inorg Chem. 2000; 39(14):3057–64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic000036s.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Schuck P. Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys J. 2000 Mar; 78(3):1606–19. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1300758/.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Brown PH, Schuck P. Macromolecular Size-and-Shape Distributions by Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation. Biophysical J. 2006; 90(12):4651–4661. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1471869/.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Bertini I, Borsi V, Cerofolini L, Gupta SD, Fragai M, Luchinat C. Solution structure and dynamics of human S100A14. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2012; 18(2):183–94. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00775-012-0963-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sturchler E, Cox JA, Durussel I, Weibel M, Heizmann CW. S100A16, a Novel Calcium-binding Protein of the EF-hand Superfamily. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281(50):38905–17. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/281/50/38905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Liriano M. Protein dynamics of calcium-S100A5 in the presence and absence of target peptide. Grantome. Available from: http://grantome.com/grant/NIH/F31-CA144560-01. Accessed 2012.
  27. Koch M, Bhattacharya S, Kehl T, Gimona M, Vašák M, Chazin W, et al. Implications on zinc binding to S100A2. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Mol Cell Res. 2007; 1773(3):457–70. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167488906004551.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Damo SM, Kehl-Fie TE, Sugitani N, Holt ME, Rathi S, Murphy WJ, et al. Molecular basis for manganese sequestration by calprotectin and roles in the innate immune response to invading bacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110(10):3841–6. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/110/10/3841.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  29. Sivaraja V, Kumar TKS, Rajalingam D, Graziani I, Prudovsky I, Yu C. Copper Binding Affinity of S100A13, a Key Component of the FGF-1 Nonclassical Copper-Dependent Release Complex. Biophys J. 2006 Sep; 91(5):1832–43. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349506718951.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Reisert J, Bauer PJ, Yau KW, Frings S. The Ca-activated Cl Channel and its Control in Rat Olfactory Receptor Neurons. J Gen Physiol. 2003; 122(3):349–64. Available from: http://jgp.rupress.org/content/122/3/349.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Gardner B, Dieriks BV, Cameron S, Mendis LHS, Turner C, Faull RLM, et al. Metal concentrations and distributions in the human olfactory bulb in Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017 Sep; 7(1):10454. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-10659-6.View ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  32. Herms J, Tings T, Gall S, Madlung A, Giese A, Siebert H, et al. Evidence of presynaptic location and function of the prion protein. J Neurosci: Official J Soc Neurosci. 1999; 19(20):8866–75.Google Scholar
  33. Hopt A, Korte S, Fink H, Panne U, Niessner R, Jahn R, et al. Methods for studying synaptosomal copper release. J Neurosci Methods. 2003; 128(1-2):159–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Horning MS, Trombley PQ. Zinc and copper influence excitability of rat olfactory bulb neurons by multiple mechanisms. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 86(4):1652–60.Google Scholar
  35. Ono SI, Cherian MG. Regional distribution of metallothionein, zinc, and copper in the brain of different strains of rats. Biol Trace Element Res. 1999; 69(2):151–9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02783866.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Streicher WW, Lopez MM, Makhatadze GI. Modulation of Quaternary Structure of S100 Proteins by Calcium Ions. Biophys Chem. 2010; 151(3):181–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2926197/.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gribenko AV, Makhatadze GI. Oligomerization and divalent ion binding properties of the S100P protein: a Ca2+/Mg2+-switch model1. J Mo Biol. 1998; 283(3):679–94. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283698921167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Moroz OV, Blagova EV, Wilkinson AJ, Wilson KS, Bronstein IB. The Crystal Structures of Human S100A12 in Apo Form and in Complex with Zinc: New Insights into S100A12 Oligomerisation. J Mol Biol. 2009; 391(3):536–51. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283609006937.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Gill SC, von Hippel PH. Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. Anal Biochem. 1989; 182(2):319–26. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003269789906027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Birdsall B, King RW, Wheeler MR, Lewis CA, Goode SR, Dunlap RB, et al. Correction for light absorption in fluorescence studies of protein-ligand interactions. Anal Biochem. 1983; 132(2):353–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Keller S, Vargas C, Zhao H, Piszczek G, Brautigam CA, Schuck P. High-Precision Isothermal Titration Calorimetry with Automated Peak Shape Analysis. Anal Chem. 2012 Jun; 84(11):5066–73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389189/.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiseman T, Williston S, Brandts JF, Lin LN. Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. Anal Biochem. 1989; 179(1):131–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Freire E, Schön A, Velazquez-Campoy A. Chapter 5 Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: General Formalism Using Binding Polynomials. In: Methods in Enzymology. vol. 455 of Biothermodynamics, Part A: Academic Press; 2009, pp. 127–155. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(08)04205-5. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0076687908042055.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement